Spirit and Psyche

When it comes to apprehending the natural world around us, do we really grasp it as it presents itself to us, in its completeness? German poet and scientist Johann Wolfgang von Goethe would argue we do not – at least, not anymore – and I am inclined to agree with him.

Continue reading: ‘Waiting Until the World Speaks’

ABSTRACT

When I set out to write this essay I wanted to write an original answer to the question “what are UFOs” but a quick glance through the literature completely shattered my intentions. UFOs have been the focus of so much attention by such interesting researchers that it is hard to say anything innovative about them. There are all kinds of approaches, from literal to symbolic and it is hard to find something that has not been said. The fact that so many opinions are thrown around and not many authors try to build on each other’s work made me think that something that could be interesting to do in this essay would be to choose a specific perspective on what UFOs are and discuss it from a critical point of view. In order to be faithful to my original suspicions about UFOs, I wanted to look at an author that thought about the UFO phenomenon from a metaphysical perspective, particularly if it had Platonic undertones.

Read ‘The UFO as Daimon’

In making the assertion that the ‘human is two and one’, Jeffrey Kripal is presenting us with an invitation to look at our humanity from two different perspectives and reflect upon the relevance which these two ways of seeing might have for research into the paranormal. In discussing Kripal’s proposition, I start by taking an overview of this apparent paradox in terms of how it has been formulated and defined from classical times right through to current neuroscientific thinking. I then proceed, in the context of “two” in relation to “one”, to examine the various dualities encountered by the human being and consider how these might be reconciled with the concept of unity.

Continue reading:’ Jeffrey Kripal on ‘Two and One’

“What isn’t there, in front of our eyes, is usually more real than what is.”
(Kingsley, 2001, p.33)

I would like to open this essay by drawing the reader’s attention to the above quotation, taken from Peter Kingsley’s, In the Dark Places of Wisdom. For it is something of this sentiment, this melancholic ache for what Kingsley describes as “the missingness [which] is too hard to bear” (2001, p.33), which I believe, pervades the being of modern man and which will lie at the heart of any attempt to answer the above question (if indeed any answer can be made). Despite the essentially slippery nature of this topic, I do not allow this to daunt me, rather, I feel now (and perhaps have always felt) eager to enter into the world of this arguably delightful subject matter. Indeed, it would seem that as I embark on the journey of this work, I am entering into a larger and more wonderful world, filled with enchanting creatures and “impossible” encounters that would seem to suggest, just as Kingsley’s words hint at, that things are not always quite what they seem, and moreover, that this vital mystery is an essential part of what it is to be human.

Continue reading: ‘What do reports of encounters with imaginal entities (angels, faerie, etc.) imply about the nature of the human psyche?’

Events of extraordinary characteristics have been part of the history of mankind since remote times. Kripal (2010, p. 253) claims that the paranormal is at the heart of religions and nowadays neuroscience wants to reduce it to a set of neurological processes. He argues that paranormal phenomena are worth studying, but if taken seriously, we are surrendering to the faith of religious tradition – therefore a third way needs to be found.

 Continue reading: ‘Discussion of Jeffrey Kripal’s assertion that the “Human is Two and one”, and its relevance for paranormal research’